Legal Opinion

Conklin v. State

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1889PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error to the district court for Frontier county. Tried below before Cochran, J. cited: State v. Shuchardt, 18 Neb., 454. Dobbins v. State, 14 Ohio State Rep., 493. 1 Bish. Crim. Proc., Sec. 821. cited: Bliss on Code Pleadings, Sec. 418. Attorney General v. Foote, 11 Wis., 14. 1 Wharton Evidence, Sec. 325, note 8.

1Opinion of the CourtCobb, J.

An information was made in the district court of Frontier county against Antoinette Conklin, charging her with having murdered one Emma May Conklin, by means of' administering to her an unknown quantity of strychnia, a-deadly poison. The defendant filed a plea in abatement to the said information, to the effect that she, the said defendant, was, and at all times since the date of the alleged offense had been, a resident of said county, and at no time had she been a fugitive from justice from this state, and-that she had never had a preliminary examination of or for the offense charged in said…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. ShuchardtNebraska Supreme Court · 1885

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. SteevesOregon Supreme Court · 1896
  2. State v. AllenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1898
  3. State v. WhitmanUtah Supreme Court · 1937
  4. State v. BarnesWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Smith v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1894

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API