Legal Opinion

Chapman v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided May 8, 1996No. 1300-93PublishedCited by 76 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

BAIRD, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of unauthorized use of a vehicle, Tex.Penal Code Ann. § 31.07, and sentenced to sixty years confinement. See, Tex.Penal Code Ann. § 12.42(d). The Court of Appeals affirmed. Chapman v. State, 859 S.W.2d 509 (Tex.App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1993). We granted appellant’s petition for discretionary review to determine whether appellant’s requested instruction was sufficient to call the trial judge’s attention to an error in the court’s charge on guilt. 1 We will reverse and remand.

I

The facts surrounding the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Stone v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
  2. Vasquez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
  3. Stiles v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
  4. Polk v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
  5. Chapman v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1993

3Cited by76 opinions

  1. Jackson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1999
  2. Solis v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1997
  3. Francis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
  4. Ex Parte MorenoCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2008
  5. Wynn v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2006

71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API