Feaster v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Phipps, Judge.
After a bench trial, Christopher Feaster was convicted of armed robbery and possession of a firearm during the commission of a crime. His motion for new trial was denied. Feaster appeals, challenging the sufficiency of the evidence and contending that the trial court erred by forcing him to go to trial with the attorney the court had appointed and by rej ecting his claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. Because Feaster has demonstrated no error, we affirm.
1. Feaster contends that the evidence was insufficient to support his convictions.
On appeal from a criminal conviction,…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Suggs v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2000
- Lajara v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1993
- Burgeson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1996
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Thomas v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
- Buford v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
- LaGON v. THE STATECourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2015
- Taylor v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.