Legal Opinion
United Transportation Union-Illinois Legislative Board v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of America
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided April 25, 1995No. 94-1037PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RANDOLPH, Circuit Judge:
We are unable to decide the principal question posed in this petition for review— whether the Interstate Commerce Commission properly interpreted the Interstate Commerce Act, 49 U.S.C. §§ 10901,11343, to deprive the agency of jurisdiction over a certain “Joint Line Agreement.” The rationale for the Commission’s jurisdictional determination is not discernible and, for that reason, the case must be returned to the agency.
I
A
Norfolk and Western Railway Company, a wholly owned subsidiary of Norfolk Southern Railway Company, provides rail freight service in thirteen states…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. American Train Dispatchers' Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- New York Dock Railway and Brooklyn Eastern District Terminal v. United States of America and Interstate Commerce CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- Service Storage & Transfer Co. v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Merchants Fast Motor Lines, Inc. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
- Texas & New Orleans Railroad v. Northside Belt Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1928
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen v. Surface Transportation BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2011
- Bar Technologies, Inc. v. Conemaugh & Black Lick RR Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1999
- BROTH. OF RR SIGNALMEN v. Surface Transp. Bd.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2011
- Commissioner v. NealCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2009
- Commissioner v. NealCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2009
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.