Commissioner v. Neal
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
1DissentTjoflat, Circuit Judge
I dissent from the opinion of the court because a careful review of applicable law reveals that neither the plain language nor the legislative history nor the historical practices of the Tax Court in relation to the innocent spousal relief provision, I.R.C. § 6015(f), indicate Congress’s intent to supplant the scope and standard of review set forth in the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”). Without citation to any cases other than Ewing/PoHer, the court has succumbed to the charms of circular reasoning and abdicated its reviewing function — that is, the court holds that the Tax Court’s…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Welch v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.