Legal Opinion

Strout Realty, Inc. v. Haverstock

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 6, 1989No. 198PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OLSZEWSKI, Judge:

This is an appeal from an order of the trial court denying appellant’s motion for post-trial relief following a verdict in favor of appellee. For reasons discussed below, we reverse.

On July 20, 1983, appellant and appellee entered into a Business Property Listing Agreement (hereinafter “agreement”) for the sale of a funeral home located in McConnellstown, Huntingdon County. The agreement provided in pertinent part:

I (we), the seller(s), employ you to procure a purchaser, ready, willing and able to buy this property at the listed price and terms, or at a lower price and terms…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Axilbund v. McAllisterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  2. Shumaker v. LEARSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. Dixon EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  4. Zitzelberger v. SalvatoreSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. Sork v. RandSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Coldwell Banker Phyllis Rubin Real Estate v. RomanoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  2. In Re BenningerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2006
  3. Benninger v. First Colony Life InsuranceUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2006
  4. FOX & ROACH LP v. BOBEREKDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2021
  5. Nazmack Development Corp. v. Eisenhart Real Estate, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, York County1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API