Legal Opinion
In re Gorney Estate
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided February 4, 2016No. Docket Nos. 323090, 323185, 323304, and 326642PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGleicher, J.
In these consolidated appeals, the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) seeks recovery of Medicaid benefits paid on behalf of the decedents. Specifically, the DHHS submitted claims in the probate courts to collect the value of the decedents’ homes upon their deaths. The estates responded that the DHHS had provided inadequate notice of its estate recovery plans and violated their *286rights to due process. The probate courts denied the DHHS’s collection attempts in all four underlying actions.
On appeal, the DHHS contends that it complied with statutory notice requirements by informing…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Bonner v. City of BrightonMichigan Supreme Court · 2014
- Polkton Charter Township v. PellegromMichigan Court of Appeals · 2005
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Ketchum Estate v. Department of Health and Human ServicesMichigan Court of Appeals · 2016
- in Re Rasmer EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 2017
- in Re Rasmer EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 2017