Legal Opinion · Dissent

Bowlin v. Hemphill

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided January 18, 1935No. 10374Published

1Dissent

Bell, and Hutcheson, JJ.,

who dissent upon authority of White v. Stewart, 131 Ga. 460 (2, 3) (62 S. E. 590, 15 Ann. Cas. 1198), and Williams v. Soy Mfg. Co., 111 Ga. 856 (3) (36 S. E. 927) ; Dailey v. Springfield, 144 Ga. 305 (87 S. E. 479, Ann. Cas. 1917D, 943) ; Turner Lumber Co. v. Henderson Lumber Co., 20 Ga. App. 682 (93 S. E. 301) ; U. S. National Bank v. Miller, 122 Or. 285 (258 Pac. 205, 58 A. L. R. 339). See-also Cherokee Fertilizer Co. v. Federal Land Bank, 179 Ga. 712 (177 S. E. 570).

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. White & Corbitt v. Stewart & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1908
  2. Dailey v. SpringfieldSupreme Court of Georgia · 1915
  3. United States National Bank v. MillerOregon Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Williams & Bessinger v. Foy Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  5. Brown v. CaylorSupreme Court of Georgia · 1915

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API