Erickson v. Lexington Baseball Club, Inc.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.
Tbe plaintiff insists that bis case should bave been submitted to tbe jury on tbe theory that tbe defendant was negligent in not providing him with a choice between screened and unscreened seats. We are inclined to tbe other view.
This was a post-season, play-off game. Interest was at a high pitch. An unusually large crowd was in attendance, tbe like of which one witness said bad never been seen before in Lexington. Tbe grandstand and bleachers ordinarily seated about twenty-five hundred people. That night more than four thousand came. Play-offs like this seldom occurred. There was one…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Quinn v. Recreation Park Assn.California Supreme Court · 1935
- Weston v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
- Brisson v. Minneapolis Baseball & Athletic Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
- Cates v. Cincinnati Exhibition Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
- Marshall v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- King v. Kayak Manufacturing Corp.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1989
- Benejam v. Detroit Tigers, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 2001
- Schneider v. American Hockey and Ice Skating CenterNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2001
- South Shore Baseball, LLC d/b/a Gary South Shore RailCats and Northwest Sports Venture, LLC v. Juanita DeJesusIndiana Supreme Court · 2014
- Allred v. Capital Area Soccer League, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.