Legal Opinion

Cates v. Cincinnati Exhibition Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 1, 1939PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSoheNCK, J.

This is an action to recover damages for personal injury alleged to have been negligently inflicted.

There was evidence tending to show that the City of Durham owned a baseball field known as El Toro Park, and that it leased said park to the Cincinnati Exhibition Company for the purpose of having games of baseball played therein between the Durham Baseball Club, owned by the Exhibition Company, and other clubs of the Piedmont League, during the season of 1936; that on the night of September 6, the Durham Baseball Club was playing a game of baseball with another baseball club of the Piedmont…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Quinn v. Recreation Park Assn.California Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Brisson v. Minneapolis Baseball & Athletic Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
  3. Wells v. Minneapolis Baseball & Athletic Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
  4. Crane v. Kansas City Baseball & Exhibition Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1913
  5. Lorino v. New Orleans Baseball & Amusement Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1931

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Jones v. Three Rivers Management Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Hudson v. Kansas City Baseball Club, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1942
  3. Leek v. Tacoma Baseball Club, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Dudley v. William Penn CollegeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
  5. Ivory v. Cincinnati Baseball Club Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1939

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API