Legal Opinion

Baumann v. The Kroger Company

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided July 29, 2016No. 20150078-CAPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GREENWOOD, Senior Judge:

¶1 Kari L. Baumann appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment against her. Baumann failed to designate any expert witnesses under rule 26 of the Utah Rules of Civil Procedure, and the district court consequently precluded her from using undesig-nated experts to contest summary judgment under the same rule. We affirm.

BACKGROUND

¶2 Baumann first filed suit against The Kroger Company (Kroger) and Dr. Gregory P. Tayler (collectively, Defendants) in 2007 after she allegedly suffered “hypotension due to overmedication.” That complaint was dismissed upon…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Allen v. FrielUtah Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Patterson v. PattersonUtah Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Nelson v. JacobsenUtah Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Bodell Construction Co. v. RobbinsUtah Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Salt Lake City Corp. v. Jordan River Restoration NetworkUtah Supreme Court · 2012

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. RJW Media Inc. v. HeathCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2017
  2. Baumann v. Kroger Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Ghidotti v. WaldronCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2019
  4. Gines v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2017
  5. VT Holdings LLC v. My Investing Place LLCCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API