Aguirre Guerra v. Dematic Corp.
District Court, D. Nevada
1Opinion
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 * * * 4 GUISELA AGUIRRE GUERRA, Case No. 3:18-CV-00376-LRH-CLB 5 Plaintiff, ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONS TO COMPEL AND FOR SANCTIONS 6 v. 7 DEMATIC CORP., et al., [ECF Nos. 118, 122, 124] 8 Defendants. 9 10 Before the Court are three separate motions to compel and for sanctions filed by 11 Plaintiff Guisela Aguirre Guerra (“Guerra”). (ECF Nos. 118, 122, 124.) Defendant Dematic 12 Corp. (“Dematic”) opposed the motions, (ECF Nos. 127, 128, 129, 133, respectively), and 13 Guerra replied. (ECF Nos. 132, 135, 134, respectively.) Having…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Harold D. Blankenship, an Individual v. The Hearst Corporation, a Corporation, William H. Myers, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. ButcherDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1986
- Millie B. Heathman v. United States District Court for the Central District of California,respondentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- Federal Trade Commission v. AMG Services, Inc.District Court, D. Nevada · 2013
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.