State v. Largo
Utah Supreme Court
1DissentCrockett, Chief Justice
Upon the basis of all of the evidence presented at the trial, the trial judge determined it was unfair and improper to use the confessions which had been obtained from the defendants. In reviewing that ruling there are certain basic propositions which should be applied. This court has heretofore indicated that the question as to whether the constitutional rights of an accused were respected is primarily for the trial court to determine;1 and that the same as with respect to other questions of fact, because of that prerogative, and his advantaged position, we indulge some deference to the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Orozco v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- State v. CriscolaUtah Supreme Court · 1968
- State v. LawrenceUtah Supreme Court · 1951
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.