Legal Opinion

Brown v. State

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1872PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Fayette. Tried below before the Hon. J. P. Richardson. The opinion of the court sufficiently indicates the facts of the case.

1Opinion of the CourtWalker, J.

This was a proceeding in the District Court of Fayette county, to escheat a league of land granted to Walter Hamilton, by the Mexican Government, as one of Austin’s colonists.

Brown, the intervenor, who has appealed the case informa pauperis, claims eight hundred acres of the land. He assigns several causes of error.

First. He complains that the court overruled his motion for a continuance. The judgment of the court on this motion is very full, and shows several good reasons for overruling the motion.

Second. The affidavit was made by the attorney, and no reason was assigned why the party did…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hamilton v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Ellis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1893

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API