Legal Opinion
United States v. Franklin
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided April 26, 2002No. Criminal No. 99-238-01, Civ. No. 01-6530PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
VAN ANTWERPEN, District Judge.
I. Introduction
The Defendant in this case is seeking habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. On September 2, 1999, Defendant Darryl Lamont Franklin was convicted by a jury of Conspiracy to Commit Hobbs Act Robbery, Interference with Commerce by Robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1951(a), Brandishing a Firearm During and in Relation to a Crime of Violence in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c), and Possession of a Firearm by a Convicted Felon in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g). We held a sentencing hearing on February 11, 2000, and on…
2Cases cited56 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United States v. FradySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Bousley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Cuyler v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. Muniz, Unpublished Decision (3-31-2004)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2004
- GAGE v. STATE OF NEW JERSEYDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2020
- GRIMSLEY v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2025