Legal Opinion

Anthony G. Taylor v. State of Indiana

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided March 11, 2019No. Court of Appeals Case 18A-IF-1475PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Vaidik, Chief Judge.

Case Summary

[1] Anthony Taylor was charged with speeding in a work zone, and the case was filed in Carmel City Court. Those events implicated two rights under Indiana law: (1) the right to a jury trial and (2) the right to a trial de novo in county court if found guilty in city court. Taylor did not request a jury trial in city court and was found guilty by the judge. He did, however, demand a jury trial when he filed his request for a trial de novo with the Hamilton County Clerk of Courts. The Hamilton Superior Court initially scheduled a jury trial but later found Taylor…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hensley v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Britton v. FoxIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
  3. Cunningham v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. Matthew Fiandt v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
  5. State of Indiana v. Norfolk Southern Railway CompanyIndiana Supreme Court · 2018

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Indiana Compensation Rating Bureau v. Technology Insurance CompanyIndiana Supreme Court · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API