Anthony G. Taylor v. State of Indiana
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Vaidik, Chief Judge.
Case Summary
[1] Anthony Taylor was charged with speeding in a work zone, and the case was filed in Carmel City Court. Those events implicated two rights under Indiana law: (1) the right to a jury trial and (2) the right to a trial de novo in county court if found guilty in city court. Taylor did not request a jury trial in city court and was found guilty by the judge. He did, however, demand a jury trial when he filed his request for a trial de novo with the Hamilton County Clerk of Courts. The Hamilton Superior Court initially scheduled a jury trial but later found Taylor…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hensley v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1969
- Britton v. FoxIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
- Cunningham v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
- Matthew Fiandt v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
- State of Indiana v. Norfolk Southern Railway CompanyIndiana Supreme Court · 2018
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Indiana Compensation Rating Bureau v. Technology Insurance CompanyIndiana Supreme Court · 2026