Legal Opinion

Ring Construction Corp. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided June 4, 1958No. 90-55PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMadden, Judge

The plaintiff sues for the extra costs which it incurred because, it says, it was required to use different and more expensive material than that called for by its contract with the Government, and was required to perform work and furnish material in addition to that called for in the contract.

By the contract in question which was dated March 23, 1948, the plaintiff agreed to build a hospital for the Veterans Administration at Albany, New York, for a lump sum which, by later amendment, was fixed at $10;086,007.84. Detailed specifications were included in the written contract. The plaintiff…

2Cited by22 opinions

  1. WPC Enterprises, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
  2. Beacon Construction Co. of Massachusetts v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
  3. Blount Brothers Construction Company v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
  4. Max Drill, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970
  5. L. Rosenman Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API