Ring Construction Corp. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the CourtMadden, Judge
The plaintiff sues for the extra costs which it incurred because, it says, it was required to use different and more expensive material than that called for by its contract with the Government, and was required to perform work and furnish material in addition to that called for in the contract.
By the contract in question which was dated March 23, 1948, the plaintiff agreed to build a hospital for the Veterans Administration at Albany, New York, for a lump sum which, by later amendment, was fixed at $10;086,007.84. Detailed specifications were included in the written contract. The plaintiff…
2Cited by22 opinions
- WPC Enterprises, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
- Beacon Construction Co. of Massachusetts v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
- Blount Brothers Construction Company v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
- Max Drill, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970
- L. Rosenman Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.