Legal Opinion

Coyle v. Pope & Talbot, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided July 3, 1962No. Civ. A. Nos. 30992, 30993PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRIM, District Judge.

These are actions by longshoremen against a shipowner for personal injuries.

Service of process on defendant, a nonresident of this District, was made by serving the Secretary of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania pursuant to the Pennsylvania Act of November 10, 1959, P.L. 1404, 12 P.S. (Pa) §§ 336, 337, authorizing such service on nonresident owners and operators of vessels in Pennsylvania waters and ports.

Defendant moves to vacate and set aside the service on the ground that the Pennsylvania statute unconstitutionally overreaches state power in that it conflicts with that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Tardiff v. Bank Line, Ltd.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1954
  2. Franklin v. Tomlinson Fleet Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1957

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. S. S. Philippine Jose Abad Santos and National Development Co. v. Jessie P. BannisterCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1964
  2. Toomer v. Southwest Casualty Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1964
  3. Fremed v. JohnsonDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1970
  4. Manson v. Weyerhaeuser Steamship Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1964
  5. Royston Distributors, Inc. v. I-S Master Skibs-A/S Golden WestDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1963

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API