Legal Opinion

Bryant v. Hartford Eastern Railway Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 5, 1930No. 22389. Department TwoPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

This action was brought by respondents to recover damages for injuries sustained by the wife at a grade crossing within the corporate limits of Granite Falls in Snohomish county. The collision occurred, according to the testimony of respondents, on January 5, 1927, at about the hour of five o’clock p. m. It was cloudy at the time, hut not raining. Ap pellant operates a railroad through Granite Falls, and operated a train thereon at about the time in question, consisting of a gas car and another joined behind it. Respondents alleged negligence in two particulars: First, in failing to ring any…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. GoodmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Cable v. Spokane & Inland Empire RailroadWashington Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Woole v. Washington Railway & Navigation Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Sadler v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1921
  5. McFadden v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1930

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Scott v. Pacific Power & Light Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Corbaley v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Hayden v. Colville Valley National BankWashington Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Pink v. Rayonier, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API