Legal Opinion
Stenz v. Sandstrom
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided December 13, 1955PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtInglis, C. J.
In this habeas corpus proceeding, the defendant made return to the writ that he was holding the plaintiff pursuant to a warrant issued by the governor of this state. The warrant directs him to arrest the plaintiff and deliver him into the custody of certain officials of the state of New Jersey who are authorized to receive him and convey him to that state as a fugitive from justice. In the reply, the plaintiff alleged that the governor’s warrant was null and void because the plaintiff was not in New Jersey on the date when the crime for which he was being extradited was committed and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Illinois Ex Rel. McNichols v. PeaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- State v. HortonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1945
- White v. WhiteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
- Ross v. CrofuttSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1911
- State v. FerrisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1908
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- State v. MorrillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- State v. BittingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
- Heating Acceptance Corporation v. PattersonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1965
- Adamsen v. AdamsenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1963
- State v. RamosSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.