Legal Opinion

Stiegler v. Hibbert

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided July 31, 1929PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The Chancellor.

Mrs. Alsentzer was dead when the testator named her in his will as one of his residuary legatees. He knew she was dead. The legacy to her was a void one, notwithstanding he knew she was dead. Dildine v. Dildine, 32 N. J. Eq. 78. In the absence of statutory provisions to the contrary, no one could take it as substitute for the named legatee. At common law, therefore, the complainants could have no possible right to receive the residuary share which, had their mother-been living, she would have taken.

The complainants claim, however, that a statute of this state comes to their aid…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Guitar v. GordonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1853
  2. Brewer v. CurtisSupreme Court of Delaware · 1920
  3. Todd v. GambrillCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1927
  4. Brewer v. CurtisSuperior Court of Delaware · 1919

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Peterson v. CalvertCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971
  2. Burton v. MastenCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1931
  3. Nelson v. Minton, Exr.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1933
  4. In Re Doyle's EstateMontana Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Doyle v. McCarrickMontana Supreme Court · 1938

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API