Burgess v. Daniels
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND JUDGMENT *
JEROME A. HOLMES, Circuit Judge.
Appellant Corey Burgess, proceeding pro se, 1 appeals the denial of three post-judgment motions he filed following the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 application for a writ of habeas corpus. 2 Mr. Burgess has also filed a motion seeking leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) in this appeal. For the reasons set forth below, we now dismiss Mr. Burgess’s appeal as untimely as it relates to the district court’s minute orders of May 21 and June 18, 2013. With re spect to district court’s order of January 2, 2014, we affirm…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Griggs v. Provident Consumer Discount Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Bowles v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Smith v. BarrySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Garza v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Gregory Ashley Moyer v. James V. Murray, et al.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2026
- Heuston v. BryantCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
- VanHorn v. Salvation ArmyDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2025