Biandi v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Western District of Tennessee; John E. McCall, Judge. Criminal prosecution by the United States against E. Biandi. Judgment of conviction, and defendant brings error.
1Per curiam
Biandi was convicted of violating R. S. § 3244 (U. S. Comp. St. § 5971), by engaging in business as a retail liquor dealer without paying the tax, and he prosecutes this writ of error. His trial occurred immediately following that of Mrs. Bailey, No. 3209, 259 Fed. 88, - C. C. A. -, whose case we have considered and disposed of by an opinion filed herewith. The facts in the Biandi Case are materially different in some respects from those in the Bailey Case, but the charge of the court to the jury shows that the case was tried upon and the conviction may rest upon that interpretation of the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Bailey v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1919
3Cited by8 opinions
- George v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
- Daniels v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1927
- Smith v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
- Hermansky v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1925
- Robilio v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1919
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.