Legal Opinion

Electric City Motors, Inc. v. Ross

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 24, 1927No. Appeal 25PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Gawthrop, J.,

This is an action in replevin. At the first trial the court below directed a verdict for the defendant and subsequently granted a new trial on the ground that some questions of fact were involved. After we affirmed the order granting a new trial (87 Pa. Superior Ct. 827) and the record was remitted to the court below, the case came before that court on the pleadings and an agreed statement of facts. It was stipulated that if plaintiff was entitled to recover upon the agreed facts, judgment should be entered for it, but if it was not, that then judgment should be entered…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Collins's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1883
  2. Ferguson v. LautersteinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1894

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Seip Et Ux. v. LaubachSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. Biddle v. BiddleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  3. Biddle v. BIDDLESupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API