State v. Bol
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Nebraska Advance Sheets 144 288 NEBRASKA REPORTS falsehood. This result demonstrates that without a remedial procedure in place, hospital acknowledgments of paternity easily become a child support system that is unconcerned with actual paternity.24 McCormack, J., joins in this dissent. 24 See Ronald K. Henry, The Innocent Third Party: Victims of Paternity Fraud,
40 Fam. L.Q. 51
(2006). State of Nebraska, appellee, v. Yai Bol, also known as Daniel D. Matit, appellant. ___ N.W.2d ___ Filed May 16, 2014. No. S-13-317. 1. Constitutional Law: Search and Seizure: Investigative Stops: Arrests:…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- State v. SimsNebraska Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. DixonNebraska Supreme Court · 2013
- Interstate Printing Co. v. Department of RevenueNebraska Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. ThomasNebraska Supreme Court · 2004
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.