Glover v. State
Alabama Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtSameord, J.
The value of the property alleged to have been stolen was less than $25, and hence the charge is a misdemeanor. Code 1923, § 4912.
The verdict of the jury was as follows: “We the jury find the defendant guilty as charged in the second count of the indictment and fix his punishment at thirty days hard labor and a fine of $25.00.”
The property stolen having been returned to the owner, it was not necessary for the jury to assess its value. Code 1923, § 4910; Du Bois v. State, 50 Ala. 139.
That part of the verdict fixing punishment at 30 days’ hard labor is a -nullity. The court must fix the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Martin v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1899
- Avery v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1899
- Du Bois v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1874
- Youngblood v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1924
3Cited by5 opinions
- Prophett v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1932
- Kyles v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1978
- Busbee v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1933
- Cain v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1975
- Parker v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1955