Legal Opinion

Glover v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided March 19, 1929No. 7 Div. 500PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSameord, J.

The value of the property alleged to have been stolen was less than $25, and hence the charge is a misdemeanor. Code 1923, § 4912.

The verdict of the jury was as follows: “We the jury find the defendant guilty as charged in the second count of the indictment and fix his punishment at thirty days hard labor and a fine of $25.00.”

The property stolen having been returned to the owner, it was not necessary for the jury to assess its value. Code 1923, § 4910; Du Bois v. State, 50 Ala. 139.

That part of the verdict fixing punishment at 30 days’ hard labor is a -nullity. The court must fix the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Martin v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1899
  2. Avery v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1899
  3. Du Bois v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1874
  4. Youngblood v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1924

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Prophett v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1932
  2. Kyles v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1978
  3. Busbee v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1933
  4. Cain v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1975
  5. Parker v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API