Legal Opinion
Sprague Electric Co. v. United States
United States Customs Court
Decided March 27, 1980No. C.R.D. 80-3; Court 77-9-03056PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NEWMAN, Judge:
INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff, an American manufacturer of tantalum electrolytic fixed capacitors, challenges the negative injury determination of the United States International Trade Commission (“Commission”) in Investigation No. AA1921-159 (41 FR 47604 (1976)), under the Antidumping Act of 1921, as amended (19 U.S.C. § 160 et seq. (1970)). That investigation involved tantalum electrolytic fixed capacitors imported from Japan which the Department of the Treasury (“Treasury”) had determined were being or were likely to be sold in the United States at less than fair value (“LTFV”)…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Camp v. PittsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Dunlop v. BachowskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. Carlo Bianchi & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Federal Power Commission v. Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Borlem S.A.—Empreedimentos Industriais v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Algoma Steel Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
- Algoma Steel Corp., Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1988
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. Modular Homes, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1994
- Metallverken Nederland B v. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1990
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.