Legal Opinion

Lucas v. State

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1922No. 22724PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, C. J.

The appellant was convicted of distilling intoxicating liquor, and the evidence is that the still was being operáted by the appellant and several others. By a special plea he claimed immunity under section 1792, Code of 1906 (Hemingway’s Code, section 2106), for the mason that he had appeared before the grand jury and testified as to the operation of the still. This plea is supported by the evidence, but the appellant was not allowed the immunity claimed.

It is not clear from the evidence whether the appellant’s appearance before the grand jury was voluntary or under compulsion, and when he…

2Cited by13 opinions

  1. Hosey v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1924
  2. State v. BatesMississippi Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Turnage v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Triplett v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Ryan v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1924

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API