Ritko v. Grove
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for Ramsey county to recover $5,120. The facts are stated in the opinion. The case was tried before Orr, J., and a jury which rendered a verdict in favor of plaintiffs for $3,-881.69. From an order denying a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial, defendant appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtStart, C. J.
This is an appeal from an order of the district court of the county of Ramsey denying the defendant’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial. The alleged cause of action arose out of a contract between the parties for the exchange of land; the claim of the plaintiffs being that they were defrauded in the transaction by the false and fraudulent representations of the defendant as to the quality, condition, and value of his land which he gave in exchange for the land of the plaintiffs. The plaintiffs had a verdict of $3,881.69. The assignments of error are numerous,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- I. L. Corse & Co. v. Minnesota Grain Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
- Stearns v. KennedySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
- Reynolds v. FranklinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
- Wallace v. HallowellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
- Porter v. FletcherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1879
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Todd v. BettingenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
- Humphrey v. SieversSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
- Townsend v. JahrSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
- Nelson v. GjestrumSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
- O'Neil v. DavidsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.