Legal Opinion · Dissent

Quick v. Department of Labor

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided December 3, 2009No. 09-006Published

1Dissent

Johnson, J.,

¶ 10. dissenting. How is it that an employee whose employer never *588filed a first report of injury, in violation of workers’ compensation laws, and whose employer threatened the employee with an illegal polygraph because the employer doubted the employee’s credibility, is not entitled to leave her job for good cause? In upholding the Board’s decision in this case, the majority opinion denies to this employee the protection of yet another Vermont law enacted for the protection of workers — the unemployment compensation system — a law that is to be liberally construed.

¶ 11. The…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Zinman v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. Hodgeman v. Jard Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1991
  3. Garrelts v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
  4. Burke v. Department of Employment SecuritySupreme Court of Vermont · 1982
  5. Habben v. GF Buche Co., Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2004

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API