Legal Opinion · Dissent

City of Eau Claire v. Wisconsin-Minnesota Light & Power Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 10, 1922Published

1DissentEschweiler, J.

The net result of the majority opinion seems to be that in an attempt to drive the good ship Railroad Commission away from roaring Scylla it is now headed, with all sails set, straight for roaring Charybdis.

Possibly much of the difficulty that is here presented is due to a lack of proper co-ordination between the statutory regulation of public utilities and that of water powers. In 1905 and 1907 was inaugurated the era of strict control and regulation of public-service corporations. From that time on no steany railroad could lay a mile of new track, either main, branch, or extension, without…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. North Dakota Ex Rel. McCueSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  2. Brooks-Scanlon Co. v. Railroad Comm'n of La.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
  3. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co. v. Railroad Commission of WisconsinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Lincoln Gas & Electric Light Co. v. City of LincolnSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  5. Puget Sound Traction, Light & Power Co. v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1917

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API