Legal Opinion
Kipp v. Bowman
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided May 31, 1935No. 488PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*700OPINION
By HORNBECK, J.
We have been favored by the opinion of the trial judge, which opinion very carefully considers and analyzes the application of §11640 GC to the various parts of §11631 GC. The trial court came to the conclusion that the petition to vacate was instituted by favor of §11631 GC and particularly parts 3 and 4 thereof, which section and germane parts thereof is as follows:
“The Common Pleas Court or the. Court of Appeals may vacate or modify its own judgment or order, after the term at which it was made:
“(3) For mistake, neglect or omission of the clerk, or irregularity in…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bachman v. SepulvedaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
- Sneary v. Nichols & Shepard Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Stewart v. ArmelIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
- Baylor v. KillingerOhio Court of Appeals · 1933
- Leonard v. RossSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Ross, a Minor v. StrickerOhio Court of Appeals · 1949
- First Natl. Bank v. GreeneOhio Court of Appeals · 1956
- Pass v. WebsterOhio Court of Appeals · 1948
- McLaughlin v. KileyOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
- Gwinn v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceOhio Court of Appeals · 1942