Legal Opinion
Aamco Transmissions, Inc. v. Romano
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided August 21, 2014No. Civil Action No. 13-5747PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
ANITA B. BRODY, District Judge.
Plaintiff Aamco Transmissions, Inc. (“AAMCO”) brings suit against its former franchisee Defendant Robert Romano and his wife Defendant Linda Romano (collectively, the “Romanos”). AAMCO alleges that the Romanos breached a covenant not-to-compete by operating a new transmission repair business in close proximity to an AAMCO center. AAMCO seeks specific performance of the covenant not-to-compete as well as costs and attorneys’ fees. I have subject matter jurisdic*704tion over AAMCO’s claims pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332.1
The Romanos move to dismiss AAM-CO’s…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Phillips v. County of AlleghenyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- In Re Burlington Coat Factory Securities Litigation. P. Gregory Buchanan, Jacob Turner and Ronald AbramoffCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Aetna Inc. v. Insys Therapeutics, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2018
- Sköld v. Galderma Laboratories, L.P.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
- Peterson v. Evapco, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2018
- Ferguson-Keller Associates, Inc. v. Plano Molding Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2017
- Allen v. CAREERS USA, INC.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2021
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.