Legal Opinion
United States v. Freedland
District Court, D. North Dakota
Decided February 27, 1953No. Cr. No. 8186PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VOGEL, District Judge.
This is a proceeding by the United States based upon a petition asking this Court for an order to show cause why the respondent should not be found guilty of criminal contempt. The order to show cause was duly issued and the case was tried to the Court.
The actions of the respondent which the petitioner alleges amounted to criminal contempt arose out of the respondent’s answers to questions put to him by the Court on the voir dire examination'prior to' his service as foreman of the jury in the case of United States v. Waldie, a criminal matter in which the defendant was…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Clark v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Matter of CochranNew York Court of Appeals · 1924
3Cited by8 opinions
- United States v. RichardUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1956
- Photostat Corporation and Lloyd Randall Ward, Jr. v. Harold E. BallCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1964
- In Re MossieDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1984
- Bays v. Petan Co. of Nevada, Inc.District Court, D. Nevada · 1982
- United States v. HensonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1959
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.