Legal Opinion

Michelle Cassel v. Hunter Givens Officer, Carl Wassberg Officer

District Court, S.D. Indiana

Decided July 28, 2026No. 2:24-cv-00406Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA TERRE HAUTE DIVISION MICHELLE CASSEL, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. 2:24-cv-00406-JPH-MKK ) HUNTER GIVENS Officer, ) CARL WASSBERG Officer, ) ) Defendants. ) ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' UNOPPOSED MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Plaintiff Michelle Cassel alleges that police officers Hunter Givens and Carl Wassberg violated her Fourth Amendment rights during a traffic stop and vehicle search. The Defendants have filed motions for summary judgment. Dkts. [60], [64]. For the reasons below, those unopposed motions are GRANTED. I. Facts and…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Mullenix v. LunaSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  4. Pennsylvania v. MimmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Rodriguez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API