Legal Opinion

Sroczynski v. Milek

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided December 17, 2008No. A-68/77 September Term 2007Published

1Opinion of the Court

961 A.2d 704 (2008)

197 N.J. 36

Walter SROCZYNSKI, Petitioner-Respondent,

v.

John MILEK, t/a John Milek Construction, Respondent, and

New Jersey Manufacturers Insurance Company, Respondent-Appellant, and

Uninsured Employer's Fund, Respondent-Respondent, and

Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital, Intervenor-Respondent.

A-68/77 September Term 2007.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued May 5, 2008.

Decided December 17, 2008.

Michael J. Marone argued the cause for appellant (McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter, attorneys; Mr. Marone and Richard J. Williams, Jr., Morristown, of counsel and on the briefs).

D…

Also in this document: Per curiam; Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Manalapan Realty v. Township Committee of the Township of ManalapanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
  2. Merin v. MaglakiSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
  3. Alan J. Cornblatt, PA v. BarowSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1998
  4. Knorr v. SmealSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2003
  5. County of Morris v. FauverSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1998

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API