Legal Opinion
Utilimatic, Inc. v. Brick Tp. MUA
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided June 18, 1993PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
267 N.J. Super. 139 (1993)
630 A.2d 862
UTILIMATIC, INC., A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF,
v.
BRICK TOWNSHIP M.U.A., DEFENDANT. UTILIMATIC, INC., A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF,
v.
LAKEWOOD TOWNSHIP MUNICIPAL UTILITY AUTHORITY AND WATER SPECIALTIES, INC., DEFENDANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division Ocean County.
Decided June 18, 1993.
Vincent P. Trovini for plaintiff (Breslin & Trovini, attorneys).
Damian G. Murray for defendant Brick Township Municipal Utilities Authority.
Norman D. Smith for defendant Lakewood Township Municipal Utilities Authority.
Cr…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Township of Hillside v. SterninSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
- Waszen v. City of Atlantic CitySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1949
- Camden Plaza Parking, Inc. v. City of CamdenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
- Skakel v. Township of North BergenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1962
- Greenberg v. FornicolaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1962
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- George Harms Construction Co. v. New Jersey Turnpike AuthoritySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
- National Waste Recycling, Inc. v. Middlesex County Improvement Authority & Waste Management of North Jersey, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
- Entech Corp. v. City of NewarkNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2002
- George Harms Construction Co. v. New Jersey Turnpike AuthoritySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
- George Harms Construction Co. v. New Jersey Turnpike AuthoritySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1994