Legal Opinion

Entech Corp. v. City of Newark

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided January 9, 2002PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

798 A.2d 681 (2002)

351 N.J. Super. 440

ENTECH CORPORATION, a New York Corporation, Plaintiff,

v.

CITY OF NEWARK, Defendant.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division.

Decided January 9, 2002.

Edward S. Kiel, Hackensack, for plaintiff, (Cole Schotz, Meisel, Forman & Leonard, attorneys).

William J. Schwartz, First Assistant Corporation Counsel, for defendant, City of Newark.

Mark L. Fleder and Damon McDougal, Roseland, for Spiniello, intervenor-defendant, (Connell Foley, LLP, attorneys).

JACOBSON, J.S.C.

INTRODUCTION

On November 16, 2001, Entech Corporation filed an Order To Show Cause and a Verified…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Kramer v. BD. OF ADJUST., SEA GIRT.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
  2. Crowe v. De GioiaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
  3. Township of Hillside v. SterninSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
  4. Terminal Construction Corp. v. Atlantic County Sewerage AuthoritySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975
  5. Meadowbrook Carting Co. v. Borough of Island HeightsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1994

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Keefe-Shea Joint Venture v. City of EvanstonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005
  2. Homemaker Serv. v. Bd. of ChosenNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2005
  3. Wiseman Construction Co. v. Maynard C. Smith Construction Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2015
  4. MONTANA CONSTRUCTION CORP. VS. JERSEY CITY MUNICIPAL UTILITIES AUTHORITY RAVI MEHTA VS. JERSEY CITY MUNICIPAL UTILITIES AUTHORITY (L-1687-20 AND L-1895-20, HUDSON COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (CONSOLIDATED)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API