Boyd v. Crosby Lumber & Manufacturing Co.
Mississippi Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
250 Miss. 433 (1964)
166 So.2d 106
BOYD
v.
CROSBY LUMBER & MANUFACTURING COMPANY
No. 43053.
Supreme Court of Mississippi.
July 1, 1964.
Robert L. Netterville, Alonzo H. Sturgeon, Natchez, for appellant.
Watson & Wilkerson, Woodville; Cox, Dunn & Clark, Jackson, for appellee.
ETHRIDGE, J.
The question in this case is whether there was substantial evidence and reasonable inferences therefrom to support the decision of the Workmen's Compensation Commission that J.E. Durham, and thus Louis Fred Boyd, the appellant, was an employee of Crosby Lumber & Manufacturing Company (called Crosby), and not an…
Also in this document: Dissent · Patterson; Dissent · Gillespie.
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Kisner v. JacksonMississippi Supreme Court · 1931
- Halliburton v. Texas Indemnity InsuranceTexas Supreme Court · 1948
- Burruss v. B. M. C. Logging Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1934
- Bowser v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1947
- Sones v. Southern Lumber Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1952
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.