Legal Opinion

Dawson v. Iron Range & Huron Bay Railroad

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 26, 1893PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Case made from Calhoun. (Hooker, J.) Garnishment proceedings. Plaintiff assigns error. The facts are stated in the opinion,

1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.

This case was tried before the court without a jury, and the court made findings of fact and law as follows:

‘'Fact.

“ 1. On March 21, 1892, the plaintiff recovered a judgment in said court against Wallace Dingman, the principal defendant, of $4,000 damages and costs.
“ 2. The writ of garnishment in this case was served upon the garnishee defendant on the 7th day of August, 1891.
“ 3. On the 16th day of August, 1890, a contract was made in writing between said Wallace Dingman and the garnishee defendant for the grading of a railroad. Said contract is a part of the record, and a copy is attached…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Dudley v. Toledo, Ann Arbor & North Michigan Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1887

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Brooks v. FieldsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  2. Randall Co. v. BriggsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
  3. Stewart v. HeywoodUtah Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Hym v. TongHawaii Supreme Court · 1902

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API