Legal Opinion

Webbe v. Keel

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 25, 2012No. SD 31483PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DANIEL E. SCOTT, Judge.

A contract for deed stated a $30,000 price, payable 10% down and the $27,000 balance in 144 monthly payments of $300. *756The buyers sued for a deed after 90 months, claiming that 90 x $300 = $27,000. They lost on summary judgment. We affirm.

Background

Appellants (“Buyers”) wanted to buy a house from Respondents (“Sellers”), but could not get a mortgage, so the parties made a contract for deed that stated in part:

• A selling price of $30,000, less a 10% down payment of $3,000, for a balance due of $27,000.

• “Payment to begin August 3, 2002, and continue each month for 144…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. ITT Commercial Finance Corp. v. Mid-America Marine Supply Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  2. Nesselrode v. Executive Beechcraft, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1986
  3. Newco Atlas, Inc. v. Park Range Construction, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2008

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Pinkerton v. FahnestockSupreme Court of Missouri · 2017
  2. CZ Services, Inc. v. Express Scripts Holding CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2020
  3. KC Processing Company, LLC v. Ian Marshall, et al.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 2026
  4. Kenashica Darpre Davison v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2015
  5. NoneDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 2019

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API