Legal Opinion

Chapman v. Sanborn

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided March 9, 1927No. 312PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Mr. Chapman, the petitioner, presents to this court an application for a writ of mandamus directing United States District Judge Sanborn, of Minnesota, to allow his petition for a writ of error to this court, to enable it to review certain alleged errors, which the petitioner assigned when he applied to the District Judge for a writ of error. He also prays this court to direct the District Judge to allow him to prosecute the writ of error which he seeks as a poor person; but, if under his petition he was not entitled to a writ of error to review the proceedings of the trial, he is not…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dower v. RichardsSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Simpson v. First Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1904
  3. Behn, Meyer & Co. v. Campbell & Go TaucoSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  4. Frame v. Portland Gold Min. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1901
  5. Hostetter v. SymesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1925

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States ex rel. Geiger v. KennamerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927
  2. Wolf v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API