Legal Opinion

Davis v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 15, 1997No. 96-2594Published

1Per curiam

Appellant, Milton K. Davis, claims his right to a direct appeal was abridged as a result of his attorney’s failure to file a notice with the court as requested by the appellant. We agree.

The State properly concedes that the record reflects defense counsel failed to insure substitute counsel would be appointed following his discharge for the purpose of discussing whether there were any viable issues for an appeal. Furthermore, the record reflects that counsel was discharged immediately following the sentencing proceeding and the issue of whether there might be an appeal was not resolved.

The…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Weisman v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  2. Parker v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API