Legal Opinion

Parker v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 30, 1994No. 93-1269PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Joseph Donald Parker [Parker] challenges his sentence, but not the underlying conviction. He argues that restitution was imposed more than sixty days after the original sentencing in violation of Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b) and that the Bay County Work Program fee which the original sentence required him to pay is not authorized by statute.

We conclude that we are without jurisdiction to address Parker’s contentions regarding the Bay County Work Program fee imposed on December 15, 1992 because Parker filed this appeal on March 30,1993, more than thirty days after the judgment…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. SandersonSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
  2. State v. MartinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  3. King v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
  4. Scott v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. McLemore v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
  2. Davis v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API