Legal Opinion
United States v. Stein
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 26, 1955PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BICKS, District Judge.
The defendant Stein has brought on six motions, to wit:(1) A motion to dismiss the indictment on the ground that the Grand Jury was improperly empanelled. Upon the argument this motion was withdrawn.(2) A motion for a bill of particulars. An analysis of the particulars demanded reveals that they are substantially similar to those heretofore sought by and denied to other defendants in this case. United States v. Flynn, D.C.S.D. N.Y.1951, 103 F.Supp. 925, affirmed 2 Cir., 216 F.2d 354, certiorari denied 348 U.S. 909, 75 S.Ct. 295. See also United States v. Dennis (sub nom.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Dennis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Beavers v. HaubertSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- United States v. DennisCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
- United States v. ProvooDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1955
- United States v. GarssonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1923
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- United States v. Jack A. LustmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958
- Jerome Kenneth Mack v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1964
- United States v. Research Foundation, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1957
- Davis v. RomneyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1972
- Mack Dean v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1959
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.