Legal Opinion

Ashley v. Hill

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided October 1, 1962No. 20,144PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Moore.

We will refer to the parties by name or as they appeared in the trial court where plaintiff in error was plaintiff and defendants in error were defendants.

*564The controversy has to do with the ownership as between plaintiff and defendants Hankins of the following property: The Qualla Millsite, U. S. Mineral Survey 56B, as distinguished from the Qualla Lode, Survey 56A (not in contention here) in the Deer Creek Mining District in Jefferson County. The only other party who has appeared here, or in the trial court, is the defendant Marjorie L. Woodworth, who is a vendee…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. State Investment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. Kean v. Calumet Canal & Improvement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1903
  3. Everett v. LantzSupreme Court of Colorado · 1952
  4. Lakelands, Inc. v. Chippewa & Flambeau Improvement Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Lawrence v. ByrnesMississippi Supreme Court · 1940

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. James P. Doyle and Florence A. DoyleCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1972
  2. United States v. Paul E. Reimann, and Maybeth Farr Reimann, His WifeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1974
  3. Hamilton v. Noble Energy, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API