Stollar v. Continental Can Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Eagen,
In these actions of assumpsit, the plaintiffs, female employees of the defendant-corporation, seek additional compensation allegedly due for work performed in the course of their employment. The court of common pleas sustained preliminary objections to the complaints in the nature of a demurrer and entered judgments for the defendant. On appeal, the Superior Court affirmed. We granted allocatur.
For the purpose of this decision, all well pleaded, facts in the complaints must be accepted as true; Wilkes-Barre Township School District v. Corgan, 403 Pa. 383, 170 A. 2d…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Sherwood v. ElgartSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
- Wilkes-Barre Township School District v. CorganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
- Sterling v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- Lemoyne Borough Annexation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
3Cited by20 opinions
- Tp. of Moon v. POL. OFFICE. OF TP. OF MOONSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Philadelphia Housing Authority v. Commonwealth, Pennsylvania Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Carrozza v. GreenbaumSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Freeport Area School District v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Anderson v. Automobile FundSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.