Legal Opinion

Hurst v. Sanders

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided February 18, 1966PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

CULLEN, Commissioner.

Appellee Eugene Sanders contracted with appellants Hurst, Nalley and Gordon, d/b/a Bardstown Mills, for the “custom” spraying with chemicals of his alfalfa and tobacco fields by use of a “Hi-Boy” sprayer, which is a seven-foot high, one-seated, three-wheeled motor vehicle having a frame-work composed mainly of tubular steel and angle-iron pieces. The alfalfa field was first sprayed, without incident. During the spraying of that field Sanders rode on the framework of the machine behind the driver, appellant Roy Thomas, who was an employe of Bardstown Mills. The machine…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Porter v. CornettCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1947
  2. Baier v. SchnellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1959
  3. Williams v. LarkinCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1954
  4. Whittaker v. ColeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1965
  5. City of Cold Spring v. RossCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1962

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Barnett v. HendrixCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API