Kirby v. State
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Rush, Chief Justice.
Post-conviction relief is both limited and exclusive. It is available only within the strictures of the post-conviction rules, and when the rules allow post-conviction proceedings, relief generally cannot be pursued any other way.
Here, the petitioner tried to use post-conviction proceedings to challenge a statute barring him, as a serious sex offender, from school property. But that restriction is a collateral consequence of his conviction-and the post-conviction rules generally allow challenges only to a conviction or sentence. While we thus affirm the denial of…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Chaidez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Reed v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2006
- Daniel Lee Pierce v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2015
- Lee v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2004
- Lambert v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State of Indiana and Indiana Bureau of Motor Vehicles v. Daniel ReinhartIndiana Supreme Court · 2018
- Nathan Healey v. Robert Carter, Commissioner of the Indiana Department of CorrectionsIndiana Court of Appeals · 2018
- Charles Gamble v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2018
- Maddenco, Inc. v. ReedDistrict Court, M.D. Louisiana · 2025
- State of Indiana v. BHIndiana Supreme Court · 2025