Single Chip Systems Corp. v. Intermec IP Corp.
District Court, S.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DENYING TRANS-CORE’S MOTION TO STRIKE THE GOLDBERG DECLARATION
HOUSTON, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
Now pending before this Court are Plaintiffs Single Chip Systems Corp. and Neology, S. de R.L. de C.V.’s (collectively “Plaintiffs”) renewed motion for summary judgment of invalidity under 35 U.S.C. § 103, and Defendants TransCore LP and TransCore Holdings, Inc.’s (collective “TransCore”) motion to strike the declaration of Jack Goldberg. Doc. Nos. 497 and 499. Oral argument was heard on June 28, 2007, with…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Dataquill Ltd. v. High Tech Computer Corp.District Court, S.D. California · 2011